{"id":647,"date":"2015-10-04T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-10-04T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/blog\/2015\/10\/04\/doctor-who-under-the-lake\/"},"modified":"2015-10-04T11:00:00","modified_gmt":"2015-10-04T11:00:00","slug":"doctor-who-under-the-lake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/blog\/2015\/10\/04\/doctor-who-under-the-lake\/","title":{"rendered":"Doctor Who: Under the Lake"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Another two-parter!  Which is a little annoying as we&#8217;re extremely unlikely to get a chance to watch the next one live &#8230; OK so fewer people I read\/follow online seem to be talking about Doctor Who so there&#8217;s less chance of inadvertent spoilers, but even so it&#8217;s a bit annoying to have to wait even longer to find out what happens!<\/p>\n<p>SPOILERS AHEAD! <span class=\"spoiler-header\">Hover mouse over text to read, or read on entry page:<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"spoiler\">Felt like a very classic Who episode in some ways &#8211; a locked base episode with running down corridors as the dominant activity, complete with monster of the week that baffles\/intrigues the Doctor and a Reason the TARDIS won&#8217;t be terribly useful.  A big difference, tho, was that once the Doctor introduces himself everyone (nearly?) is all &#8220;oh, the Doctor, UNIT, yes we know these things&#8221;, he probably didn&#8217;t even need the psychic paper. So we don&#8217;t have so much faffing about with people trying to assert authority (except Pritchard and it was quickly established he was the one no-one was going to miss when he died). <\/p>\n<p>Ended with a somewhat less easy to unpick cliff-hanger than the last one.  I mean, it&#8217;s again obvious that the Doctor isn&#8217;t dead just like Clara &#038; Missy weren&#8217;t.  But I&#8217;ve less of any idea of how they&#8217;re sorting it out: teleport seems less plausible &#8230; holograms? we&#8217;ve had that flagged as a possibility by the Clara-hologram in the &#8220;faraday&#8221; cage room (<i>so<\/i> not a faraday cage, but hey it&#8217;s science fantasy not science fiction, that&#8217;s the mantra to keep in mind).  J pointed out that two of the deaths previously were off-stage with no body visible (top-hat-alien dude and the heroic commander) so maybe the ghosts don&#8217;t require death to be formed, but in the case of Pritchard the Creepy Corporation Guy we did actually see his body so that too seems less than plausible.  We&#8217;ll find out in a week (or two) I guess \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p>I liked that Cass (second in command, deaf) was characterised primarily as &#8220;cleverest in the room when the Doctor steps out&#8221; and &#8220;sensible&#8221;, and deaf was not her defining feature.  I think it&#8217;s going to turn out to be plot relevant though &#8211; we had her skill at lip reading used this episode. But the thing we had flagged up several times during the episode and not resolved was that she won&#8217;t let her translator into the ship because it&#8217;s dangerous.  So she&#8217;s perceiving something the others aren&#8217;t &#8211; could be just she&#8217;s the cleverest one, but also maybe not a coincidence that &#8220;earworm&#8221; was the analogy the Doctor chose?<\/p>\n<p>Odd little interlude in the middle with the Doctor cautioning Clara about &#8220;going native&#8221;, and the offhand reference to the TARDIS only being big enough for one of him.  Clara as wannabe-Doctor or Apprentice Doctor (to be more fair) has been a running theme for most of the time she&#8217;s been in the show.  That and her seeming inability to take any of the threats seriously &#8211; it&#8217;s all an adventure and she quickly forgets\/doesn&#8217;t care about the risks.  They&#8217;ll win in the end, right? No-one important dies &#8230; Which sits oddly against the compassion&gt;* theme of the previous episode.  So, yes, odd.  Also odd was the Doctor being again ill at ease with the social politnesses of human society &#8211; I have a feeling that Moffat Who in general has been keen to use such things to play up the alieness of the Doctor.  But it doesn&#8217;t sit well with me &#8211; in that I don&#8217;t expect the Doctor to need cue cards and Clara&#8217;s help to remember to say &#8220;oops, yes, sorry for your loss&#8221; when he tactlessly holds forth about the exciting possibilities of someone&#8217;s friend&#8217;s death.  I do think the tactlessness in the first place is in character tho \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t think the titles have anything particularly season-arc significant about them after all, in fact I&#8217;m at a loss there &#8211; either there&#8217;s nothing obvious for the red-thread running through the season or I&#8217;m being dumb.  Both are eminently possible &#8230; and I did forget to look for the wedding ring this time, I don&#8217;t think it was a shoved under our metaphorical noses.  I like that the sunglasses are a Thing that we appear to be keeping &#8211; fits with the &#8220;don&#8217;t believe what you see&#8221; sort of themes too, changing perceptions though the right lenses etc.  Even if not significant to the arc (if they&#8217;re not) titles are still interesting to think about &#8211; I so rarely <i>notice<\/i> titles (yes, I know, bad reader\/viewer, no biscuit) that I forget to think about how they tie into what they&#8217;re titling.  Under the Lake still pings as Arthurian to me, and we do have a sword popping up as prominent feature of the episode, abeit not literally.  Before the Flood is more biblical tho: the sinful world before it was cleansed.  And an Ark, a survival pod if you will &#8230;<\/div>\n<div class=\"navi\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/blog\/2015\/09\/27\/doctor-who-witchs-familiar\">&lt; Previous Episode<\/a> | Next Episode &gt;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Another two-parter! Which is a little annoying as we&#8217;re extremely unlikely to get a chance to watch the next one live &#8230; OK so fewer people I read\/follow online seem to be talking about Doctor Who so there&#8217;s less chance of inadvertent spoilers, but even so it&#8217;s a bit annoying to have to wait even &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/blog\/2015\/10\/04\/doctor-who-under-the-lake\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Doctor Who: Under the Lake&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[13,14],"class_list":["post-647","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-doctor-who","tag-television-fiction"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=647"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ninecats.org\/margaret\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}